Ethical guidelines for program and research implementation with socially marginalized youth within virtual spaces

Authors

  • Daniel E. Inwood University of Chicago
  • Adaurennaya C. Onyewuenyi College of New Jersey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jcycw.2025.471

Keywords:

Child and youth care ethics

Abstract

Youth-centered practitioners and researchers often use the virtual space to recruit, collect data, and implement programs for hard-to-reach and socially marginalized children, youth, and young adult populations. This approach has increased research and program development with understudied populations that are less accessible through traditional in-person recruitment strategies. Although the online space has been widely used for nearly three decades, there are still no universal guidelines for youth-centered practitioners and researchers who engage in such methods. Guided by The 2024 Standards of Practice of North American Child and Youth Care Professionals and case study examples, this article highlights three critical ethical problems and best practices for mutually constitutive engagement with socially marginalized youth in the virtual space. Although each youth-centered program or study is designed with its particular participants and their unique needs in mind, these best practices are widely applicable.

References

Cornell University Institutional Review Board. (2013). IRB Policy 20: Use of social networking sites or mobile devices for human participant research. https://researchservices.cornell.edu/policies/irb-policy-20-use-social-networking-sites-or-mobile-devices-human-participant-research#:~:text=Policies-,IRB%20Policy%3A%20%2320%20Use%20of%20Social%20Networking%20Sites%20or%20Mobile,for%20research%20involving%20human%20participants.

Craig, S. L., Brooks, A. S., Doll, K., Eaton, A. D., McInroy, L. B., & Hui, J. (2023). Processes and manifestations of digital resilience: Video and textual insights from sexual and gender minority youth. Journal of Adolescent Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584221144958

Gooding, A. R., Zaman, B. A., Harrell, S. J., Collins, S., Abelson, M. J., & Anderson-Nathe, B. (2023). Situated agency: How LGBTQ youth navigate and create queer(ed) space. Journal of LGBT Youth, 20(3), 524-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2022.2089430

Granic, I., Morita, H., & Scholten, H. (2020). Beyond screen time: Identity development in the digital age. Psychological Inquiry, 31(3), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820214

McDaniel, D. S. (2024). “Bold of them to assume I want to wait until I'm older to do what I love:” One teen's activism and civic engagement online. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 67(6), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1343

McFarland, L. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1653–1677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039244

Navarro, J. L., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2022). Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological theory. Current Psychology, 42, 19338-19354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3

Nesi, J., Telzer, E. H., & Prinstein, M. J. (2020). Adolescent development in the digital media context. Psychological Inquiry, 31(3), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820219

Poquiz, J. L., Shrodes, A., Garofalo, R., Chen, D., & Coyne, C. A. (2022). Supporting pride, activism, resiliency, and community: A telemedicine-based group for youth with intersecting gender and racial minority identities. Transgender Health, 7(2), 179-184. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2020.0152

Subrahmanyam, K., & Šmahel, D. (2011). Digital youth: The role of media in development. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6278-2

University of California, Santa Barbara Office of Research. (2021). In line with online research guidance. https://www.research.ucsb.edu/news/human-subjects-research-integrity/line-online-research-guidance

University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute. (2021). New institutional social media guidelines available. https://www.ctsi.ufl.edu/2021/12/10/new-institutional-social-media-guidelines-available/

University of Massachusetts Amherst Office of Research Compliance. (2022). Social media research guidance. https://www.umass.edu/research/compliance/human-subjects/irb-guidance/social-media-research-guidance

Wilf, S., Maker Castro, E., Gupta, K. G., & Wray-Lake, L. (2023). Shifting culture and minds: Immigrant-origin youth building critical consciousness on social media. Youth & Society, 55(8), 1589-1614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X221103890

Downloads

Published

2025-10-22

How to Cite

Inwood, D. E., & Onyewuenyi, A. C. (2025). Ethical guidelines for program and research implementation with socially marginalized youth within virtual spaces. Journal of Child and Youth Care Work, 31. https://doi.org/10.5195/jcycw.2025.471

Issue

Section

Special Features